<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel><title>Ed Brill | Comments</title><description>Collaboration, technology, travel, Chicago, and more</description><link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:00:31 AM -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 11:00:31 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dimitri Prosper</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@Murray - I can find a few things that don't work well with traffic lights, i.e. I see opportunities for improvements: <br /><br />1) Why do I have to sit @ an intersection waiting for 2 minutes when there is no traffic coming from the other sides. Seems like their should be a "better" way of recognizing present conditions and appropriately handling the condition. <br /><br />2) On a major street by me there are two traffic lights that are two car lengths away from each other, way too often because of bad coordination between the two lights - and the person behind the wheels - a car gets stuck blocking the intersection. <br /><br />3) Too many times I sit at a light and wonder if it is ever going to turn green. Call me impatient, but how about a something that tells me my turn is coming up in 5 seconds or 2 minutes. <br /><br />Inventing something "completely new" when people have either built, conceptualized and patented millions of things, seems almost impossible to me. I don't think Ed is speaking of re-inventing the wheel, but trying to improve on something by making more responsive to present conditions. <br /><br />I still own a plain old wireless phone which I use to call my family/friends, I have a good old plain mp3 player which I use when I exercise, and I do use snail mail to send pictures around during the holidays. all things that work perfectly well. However, adding a new twist to something that already exist, mashing two things that never got put together before, perfecting on something with the goal of making things easier and more attractive to people is what I believe makes companies like Facebook and Apple the companies that they are today and why I use their product/services. I don't personally feel like they invented "something new", just a better way of doing the same things.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Murray - I can find a few things that don't work well with traffic lights, i.e. I see opportunities for improvements: <br /><br />1) Why do I have to sit @ an intersection waiting for 2 minutes when there is no traffic coming from the other sides. Seems like their should be a "better" way of recognizing present conditions and appropriately handling the condition. <br /><br />2) On a major street by me there are two traffic lights that are two car lengths away from each other, way too often because of bad coordination between the two lights - and the person behind the wheels - a car gets stuck blocking the intersection. <br /><br />3) Too many times I sit at a light and wonder if it is ever going to turn green. Call me impatient, but how about a something that tells me my turn is coming up in 5 seconds or 2 minutes. <br /><br />Inventing something "completely new" when people have either built, conceptualized and patented millions of things, seems almost impossible to me. I don't think Ed is speaking of re-inventing the wheel, but trying to improve on something by making more responsive to present conditions. <br /><br />I still own a plain old wireless phone which I use to call my family/friends, I have a good old plain mp3 player which I use when I exercise, and I do use snail mail to send pictures around during the holidays. all things that work perfectly well. However, adding a new twist to something that already exist, mashing two things that never got put together before, perfecting on something with the goal of making things easier and more attractive to people is what I believe makes companies like Facebook and Apple the companies that they are today and why I use their product/services. I don't personally feel like they invented "something new", just a better way of doing the same things.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#02082012110031AMPSCMXV.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:42:18 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Neil Wainwright</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs would let go of the past and build for the future.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Steve Jobs would let go of the past and build for the future.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#02082012084218AMPSCK9H.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2012: Mobility</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:30:44 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Anantha</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2012: Mobility</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Ed, are there plans for making the mobile integration easy by fully implementing ActiveSync protocol? Most mobile devices implement the client side ActiveSync on their native mail client. For whatever reason the Traveler server side doesn't implement the fully protocol stack including encryption.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ed, are there plans for making the mobile integration easy by fully implementing ActiveSync protocol? Most mobile devices implement the client side ActiveSync on their native mail client. For whatever reason the Traveler server side doesn't implement the fully protocol stack including encryption.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2012-mobility?opendocument&amp;comments#02082012073044AMPSCHUR.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:53:10 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I think this kind of discussion also prompts the question "Is there really something wrong with the current process/system which means it needs to be changed or replaced?". <br /><br />Personally I think there are for too many companies and individuals desperately trying to find replacements for systems that already function well.<br /><br />In answer to your question "What would a traffic signal look like today if we didn't have the historical example of a red/yellow/green light?" I think it should be the same. Traffic Lights are a very good example of a process/system that just works, so why do people expend time and money trying to find a "Better" way to do something that functions perfectly well already? <br /><br />Why spend time trying to reinvent the wheel when you could invent something completely new? But I guess inventing something completely new is not as easy as trying to produce a "Better" version of X,Y,Z right?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think this kind of discussion also prompts the question "Is there really something wrong with the current process/system which means it needs to be changed or replaced?". <br /><br />Personally I think there are for too many companies and individuals desperately trying to find replacements for systems that already function well.<br /><br />In answer to your question "What would a traffic signal look like today if we didn't have the historical example of a red/yellow/green light?" I think it should be the same. Traffic Lights are a very good example of a process/system that just works, so why do people expend time and money trying to find a "Better" way to do something that functions perfectly well already? <br /><br />Why spend time trying to reinvent the wheel when you could invent something completely new? But I guess inventing something completely new is not as easy as trying to produce a "Better" version of X,Y,Z right?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#08022012035310PSCDLS.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lotusphere 2012: Lotus Notes/Domino Social Edition</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 03:40:59 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sharon Bellamy </dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotusphere 2012: Lotus Notes/Domino Social Edition</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[So many customers interested in this - would love to be on the beta, especially as these customers are also interested in the other aspects of social now (connections entitlements) - what do we need to do to register interest in the beta ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So many customers interested in this - would love to be on the beta, especially as these customers are also interested in the other aspects of social now (connections entitlements) - what do we need to do to register interest in the beta ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/lotusphere-2012-lotus-notesdomino-social-edition?opendocument&amp;comments#08022012034059PSCDD9.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now available - Lotus Notes Traveler for Android</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:19:19 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rafik</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Now available - Lotus Notes Traveler for Android</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hello all,<br /><br />thes case was solved by port 443]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello all,<br /><br />thes case was solved by port 443]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/now-available-lotus-notes-traveler-for-android?opendocument&amp;comments#08022012021919PSCBS5.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:10:43 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mark Roden</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@Carl - YES !<br /><br />I think a broader question really though is why are we less open the change the older we as people (a nation) get, more risk averse maybe?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Carl - YES !<br /><br />I think a broader question really though is why are we less open the change the older we as people (a nation) get, more risk averse maybe?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#02072012081043PMPSC4KR.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 04:38:19 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carl Tyler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hate to tell you this, Outlook offers scrolling by week in month view.<br /><br />"what would a traffic signal look like today if we didn't have the historical example of a red/yellow/green light?"<br /><br />Answer: Roundabout]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hate to tell you this, Outlook offers scrolling by week in month view.<br /><br />"what would a traffic signal look like today if we didn't have the historical example of a red/yellow/green light?"<br /><br />Answer: Roundabout]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#02072012043819PMPSCUJZ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 04:18:55 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Timothy Briley</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Wired: Clive Thompson on Analog Designs in the Digital Age</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Because of the Android integration, I use the Google calendar for my personal life. To get a rolling view:<br /><br />Click "Calendar Settings", then scroll down to "Custom View", then set that field to "three weeks" or if you are so inclined, to "four weeks".]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because of the Android integration, I use the Google calendar for my personal life. To get a rolling view:<br /><br />Click "Calendar Settings", then scroll down to "Custom View", then set that field to "three weeks" or if you are so inclined, to "four weeks".]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/wired-clive-thompson-on-analog-designs-in-the-digital-age?opendocument&amp;comments#07022012161855PSCU6V.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 02:14:50 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Eric Otchet</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@34, @35<br /><br />LotusScript support is something that we are still working on from an Apache OpenOffice point of view. There are some technical issues we must solve before I am able to give you definitive answers. Our intent is to extend the current Symphony/LotusScript support to the Apache OpenOffice code. There is no intent to have it only work with the "IBM Edition" . I cannot say whether it will work with any other distributions like LibreOffice since there may be code required in the core to enable it.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@34, @35<br /><br />LotusScript support is something that we are still working on from an Apache OpenOffice point of view. There are some technical issues we must solve before I am able to give you definitive answers. Our intent is to extend the current Symphony/LotusScript support to the Apache OpenOffice code. There is no intent to have it only work with the "IBM Edition" . I cannot say whether it will work with any other distributions like LibreOffice since there may be code required in the core to enable it.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3.0.1-is-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#02072012021450PMPSCRRB.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>That does it for the Tumi</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 07:05:53 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>That does it for the Tumi</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I fly almost 100,000 miles a year. Briggs and Reilly repairs, free of charge, all damages. They are simply the best.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I fly almost 100,000 miles a year. Briggs and Reilly repairs, free of charge, all damages. They are simply the best.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/that-does-it-for-the-tumi?opendocument&amp;comments#02072012070553AMPSCHD8.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:43:19 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Eric Otchet</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@12 Adam,<br /><br />No that won't be supported. There will be integration with Notes and other products in the portfolio available. For example if you choose File--Send -- In email from the OO menu .. it will launch Notes. We are also working on extending our LotusScript support to the Apache OpenOffice 4 implementations.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@12 Adam,<br /><br />No that won't be supported. There will be integration with Notes and other products in the portfolio available. For example if you choose File--Send -- In email from the OO menu .. it will launch Notes. We are also working on extending our LotusScript support to the Apache OpenOffice 4 implementations.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012034319PMPSCTGM.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 03:33:16 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Jens-B. Augustiny</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[... and regarding the LSX, if it is continued, will it have the ability to use Libre- or Open-Office as its target in addition to whatever IBM version it will work with?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... and regarding the LSX, if it is continued, will it have the ability to use Libre- or Open-Office as its target in addition to whatever IBM version it will work with?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3.0.1-is-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#06.02.2012153316PSCTAG.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 02:56:12 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Bernfried Geiger</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3.0.1 is now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@32 Eric Otchet<br /><br />What about the lsx integration of the Notes client - Is it already save to say, that the lsx will survive into 'whatever IBM version' based on Apache OO Version 4 and Notes Next (with whatever name it may have)?<br /><br />I am very close to the start of such Project. (Budget is already clear, MS Office is still in the race). I guess I should have stopped by at Lotusphere. too late now.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@32 Eric Otchet<br /><br />What about the lsx integration of the Notes client - Is it already save to say, that the lsx will survive into 'whatever IBM version' based on Apache OO Version 4 and Notes Next (with whatever name it may have)?<br /><br />I am very close to the start of such Project. (Budget is already clear, MS Office is still in the race). I guess I should have stopped by at Lotusphere. too late now.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3.0.1-is-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#06.02.2012145612PSCSKA.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:02:30 PM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Adam Osborne</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Ed,<br /><br />Does the plan include the ability to run OO 4 inside Notes like we can today ?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Ed,<br /><br />Does the plan include the ability to run OO 4 inside Notes like we can today ?]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012010230PMPSCQC5.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Business Gets Social 2012 - formerly Lotusphere Comes to You - dates announced</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:27:15 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John Jardin</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Business Gets Social 2012 - formerly Lotusphere Comes to You - dates announced</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Thanks Ed. Let me see what I can do here first then.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />John]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thanks Ed. Let me see what I can do here first then.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />John]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/business-gets-social-2012-formerly-lotusphere-comes-to-you-dates-announced?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012112715AMPSCNGL.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Business Gets Social 2012 - formerly Lotusphere Comes to You - dates announced</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:52:28 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Brill</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Business Gets Social 2012 - formerly Lotusphere Comes to You - dates announced</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@8/9 I rarely have the details of individual events; you are probably closer to IBM software marketing in ZA than I am. If not, send me a mail and i will try to connect you to the event organizer....]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@8/9 I rarely have the details of individual events; you are probably closer to IBM software marketing in ZA than I am. If not, send me a mail and i will try to connect you to the event organizer....]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/business-gets-social-2012-formerly-lotusphere-comes-to-you-dates-announced?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012095228AMPSCLMC.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:31:49 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Eric Otchet</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@all,<br /><br />In case you had trouble with the Ed's link in the blog to the Symphony Buzz page with the FAQ .. here is the correct link to use until Ed can update ..<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=FDC7246494FF2FA38525799A0006B394&category=announcements " target="_blank" title="Link: www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=FDC7246494FF2FA38525799A0006B394&category=announcements ">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@all,<br /><br />In case you had trouble with the Ed's link in the blog to the Symphony Buzz page with the FAQ .. here is the correct link to use until Ed can update ..<br /><br />{ <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=FDC7246494FF2FA38525799A0006B394&category=announcements " target="_blank" title="Link: www-03.ibm.com/software/lotus/symphony/buzz.nsf/web_DisPlayPlugin?open&unid=FDC7246494FF2FA38525799A0006B394&category=announcements ">Link</a> }]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012083149AMPSCK2X.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:15:09 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Brill</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Err, that was 8/7/6 respectively. Jetlag.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Err, that was 8/7/6 respectively. Jetlag.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012081509AMPSCJQJ.htm</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:14:33 AM -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Brill</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More on the Lotus Symphony and desktop productivity roadmap</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[@3 IBM is part of the full name of Lotus Symphony. The 3.0.x version continues to be called Symphony.<br /><br />@2 there are still some ibmers using PowerPoint but also those using symphony saving as .ppt <br /><br />@1 if you look thru the deck you see refernce to Union Pacific, there are many other large companies worldwide.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@3 IBM is part of the full name of Lotus Symphony. The 3.0.x version continues to be called Symphony.<br /><br />@2 there are still some ibmers using PowerPoint but also those using symphony saving as .ppt <br /><br />@1 if you look thru the deck you see refernce to Union Pacific, there are many other large companies worldwide.]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.edbrill.com/ebrill/edbrill.nsf/dx/more-on-the-lotus-symphony-and-desktop-productivity-roadmap?opendocument&amp;comments#02062012081433AMPSCJQ6.htm</link>
</item>

</channel></rss>

