IBM Response to Study "Comparing Microsoft .NET and IBM WebSphere/J2EE"
I posted the public version of this document in the Lotus Partner Forum last week... now it looks like WebSphere Journal has picked it up...

The latest Middleware Company study is flawed and does not accurately reflect the capability of WebSphere J2EE vs. Microsoft .NET. Like two previous discredited Middleware Company studies, this study was funded by Microsoft. While expert Microsoft programmers were allowed to contribute to the .NET side, neither IBM nor other WebSphere J2EE product experts were invited to contribute to the testing.
Some of the discrepancies in the way this report was conducted are pretty severe, even to my experienced eye.
Link: WebSphere Journal: New Internal IBM Report says "Another flawed study" >

Post a Comment